Thursday, June 30, 2011

The ravings of a lying lunatic


Now, go back to a previous posting here, and a certain email posted on a Conservapedia user page in the fall of 2010, and one line stands out among everything else, because it clearly shows the "integrity" of liberals in general, and certain individuals in particular:
"I will lie, revise history, cheat, steal and censor to further our goals. What are you going to do about it? I will stop at no end, but you have to operate within the fictional bounds of your morality."
In my previous postings I talked about two different incidents involving several different people, and, besides attacking me, they had one thing in common. They wanted me to "fess up" to a lie which they seemed to think I created. In one, a "suicide" was created out of thin air; the other involved the manipulation of an email account and non-existent death threats. Both were found out to be frauds. Are you interested, reader?

But there's more to it than that, and it concerns the "freedom" that some people think they have over others. From the start in late-2007, Conservapedia has been under assault by individuals who decided on their own that since they couldn't control what wasn't theirs, they would destroy it. They resorted to major and minor vandalism; they tried forcing an ideology incompatible with the site; they picked fights; launched DDoS attacks, and having failed at that they even resorted to extortion threats, harassment, and cyber-terrorism. That is the "beauty" of liberalism at work; remember, liberals preach "tolerance"...as long as you agree with them.

Now, here's a little link for all of you to read. It's called "Conservaleaks", apparently after the WikiLeaks site. Go ahead and read the many files in it. There are personal records of private communication, fun banter, some regular chit-chat, and many discussions of the ways and means of protecting Conservapedia from the thugs that try to damage it. Unfortunately, it was a thug who broke into the Google group account in which it was based and posted it out in the open, and this thug did it by following the below statement, which was probably his to begin with:
"I will lie, revise history, cheat, steal and censor to further our goals. What are you going to do about it?"
This individual who did the lying in order to do the stealing calls himself PsyGremlin; in another blog site he calls himself CPmonitor; it was on his site there that he was forced to remove stolen video of my son. All you have to do, reader, is to look up what he's really like by reading his blog; instead of claiming we cannot take criticism, all you can see are the rantings and ravings of of a paranoid who's blindly-obsessive with Conservapedia, as if he has no other life at all outside of his delusions. Instead of "digging the dirt on the crazies out there" as his blog proudly proclaims, he has himself become the crazy in the dirt.

So he has to fire off an email to me, calling me "classy" for ordering WordPress to remove my son's video from his blog, and in another he thinks he's never lied at all, quote:
"what actual damage did Jessica cause CP, besides highlight what a dick TK was? I'd like to see a list."
Of course, he leaves out the damage he caused when "ConservaLeaks" was created, due to his own lying and deceit.
"Ever consider manning up and actually asking me to remove or tone down something you didn't like? or does that offend your persecution complex? Then again, given that Brian isn't even man enough to open the comments section on his blog, there really isn't any more to say."
This is part of his email to me - masquerading as a possibly-fictional "John Lewis" - that just doesn't deserve much of a response. What I will say is two things, and I'm sure Mr. Psy-co is reading this. The first has to do with criticism. Honest, constructive criticsm has more to do with building up, but the evidence from his blog and the so-called "rational" website he trolls in have more to do with unjustified and unwarranted attacks than anything else. He has no intention of anything remotely-resembling criticism. As for the attacks, he has absolutely no excuse.

The second part has what he wanted me to do, which is to "be man enough" and open up my comments section in my blog so he can "criticize" me his way.

Here's what I have to say, and you can call it an honest, constructive criticism of Mr. Psy-co: I don't debate trash. I toss it in the dumpster.

I do hope that's clear enough for a little man like him to understand.

Monday, March 28, 2011


Today, at least since three in the morning, there has been a "denial of service attack" on Conservapedia. What this means to the average layman reading this is a DDoS attack is conducted by the liberal left when they are faced with an idea they don't like; they try to shut it down. It's no different then when someone comes into your room and changes the channel from the TV program you were watching, just to force you to watch what he likes. And this time, it's all because of a simple cartoon on the main page, one that mocks the concept of evolution.

Now, I'm going to give you the reader a historical incident which is similar. It is something where you have to set your Way-Back machine to about the late 1870's, in New York City. The power that held a strangle-hold on New York at that time was the Democratic Party. Democrats ran everything, and everything was a racket to them. To get something built, to get something done, you had to pay kickbacks to some Democratic crony in power, and the man in charge who demanded the greatest amount of cash was William Marcy Tweed. Boss Tweed. He and his Tammany Hall cronies were adept at skimming money off building contracts to the point where they amassed a $12 million dollar fortune (some estimates place the figure as high as $200,000,000), a king's ransom in those days. The contracts involving public works overseen by Tammany and Tweed were riddled with corruption.

Tweed bribed a lot of people to get his way, but he couldn't get past one man who who knew a rat when he saw one: Thomas Nast. Nast happened to be a cartoonist, responsible for the image of the elephant as the Republican Party's mascot, and the current image of Santa Claus. When it came to Tweed, Nast used his pen to point out just how bad the Boss really was. Tweed as a buzzard waiting for the next meal; Tweed in a circle of cronies as they're deflecting blame; Tweed drunk on his own power; Tweed waiting at the voting booth, intending to ensure the proper "outcome" of an election. And those cartoons had a effect, as the walls he had built had shown signs of collapsing. "My constituents don't know how to read," Tweed was supposed to have said, "but they can't help seeing them damned pictures!" And the pictures did have an effect. His corruption was outted; he escaped to Spain, where he was identified through one of Nast's cartoons. He died in a jail cell in 1878.

Here's what we have going on right now. There are people who do not like conservatism; they do not like the morals and responsibility and accountability which is attached to conservatism. They cannot stand God, they cannot stand the Bible, and many of them are quick to dismiss "Jeebus" - as they call Jesus - as nothing more than a farce. And most of all they cannot stand anyone who would adhere to any of it. What they did to Conservapedia during the past 24 hours is very typical of their "philosophy", which is to shut down any kind of speech they don't like. It's to control what goes on in the public sphere regarding speech and ideas, exactly like Tweed attempted to do over a century ago in New York. One could even go so far as to say that this is the liberal's version of what Islamic fanatics attempted to do against the individuals who created the "Mohammed" cartoons in the past few years.

And these same liberals say they're on the side of tolerance? The only thing they actually did was to prove us to be right all along.

And they got offended over a simple cartoon!

Wednesday, March 9, 2011

Coward, part 2

One coward goes down, it seams, then another crawls out from under his rock. This case has a different angle to it, but the motives are the same.

Set the time machine back to October, 2010. We had a user on Conservapedia named Willminator, and he happened to be the unwilling participant in a fight with a certain individual who calls himself "Jeff Tavolieri". The fight took place via emails, and Will published those emails on his user page for all to see. The last one placed on that page from "Jeff" was this:

Sent: Tue, September 21, 2010 2:06:13 PM
Subject: you will never stop us

"You may have it figured out, but you can never stop us. Let this be a warning to you: I am pro-abortion. I do support population control. I do support letting the weak die (or even helping them die). I do want to take your guns away you. I will see to it that no prayer is ever given in a public school. I will fight to destroy the institution of marriage as you know it. I will indoctrinate your children and insulate them from your religious dogma. I will fight the conservative myth of american exceptionalism. I will fight for a one world government. I will fight for gays in the military even if it weakens it. I will lie, revise history, cheat, steal and censor to further our goals. What are you going to do about it? I will stop at no end, but you have to operate within the fictional bounds of your morality. How can you win this game when I can break the rules? Give it up and get out of america while you still can because nothing will stop us. Do you think you're going to fight? Do you think we would have any problem using chemical warfare or weapons of mass destruction? Do you think we care if women and children get in the way? Face it, we will win. Liberalism and atheism will prevail. The conservative movement will be systematically dismantled and there is NOTHING you can do. Wake up to the facts. Wake up to a war that you simply cannot win."

But it gets better. On the website known as "RationalWiki" this same "Jeff" - who called himself "JeffT" on that site - stated that the emails were made up (see the arrow in the picture); they weren't his, even though he admitted he added the words "and stupid" to the tail-end of one of them dated October 9. So, they're either "Jeff's" emails...or they're not.

Now, advance the time machine forward a couple of months. "Jeff" crawls out again from under his rock and attacks me personally. In another series of emails, "Jeff" decides I was responsible for posting the previous correspondence with Willminator in public and sending them out on the internet. In his whining he says:

"From your latest discussiongroupgate, I see you are the one responsible for forwarding emails around the conservative blogosphere. Do you know what these "conservatives" on those forums have done to me? I have received more hate mail than I can count and no less than a dozen death threats. Somehow, some of these lunatics have gotten my phone number. What do you think about that? Do you think it's funny that these people found out where I work? That they've called and harassed me? That I nearly was fired because of all this? You should be disgusted with yourself."

My response to him:

"Since you have had "death threats" - or so you say - you're going to get a hold of your local police department and file a report. You're going to provide evidence that you did receive these threats, as well as provide your boss's phone number to them as well, so they could corroborate the threat of firing. You're going to explain to them how they were able to determine your private address, phone number, SSN, and other things after looking at a disposable email account which you now have and are replying to me with. You're also going to explain to them - as well as a JUDGE - how you got a hold of "discussiongate," which is a private web-based group meant for others to discuss the ways and means of protecting Conservapedia."

"Jeff" would have none of that. Since this little war was begun, he has continued with his demands that I provide access to my lawyer, details of my location, etc. But even he admitted he's still not sure of what - if anything at all - that I did:

"How in the world do you think that's going to happen without your contact information???

I'm still not even sure what (if anything) you did, because you're not being honest."

The fact is that "Jeff" is the one who's not being honest. He was slaughtered by Willminator in the earlier email series; he admitted those emails were not his; now he's attacking me by stating those emails were his after all. And the "death threats" he claimed? Just where is the police report at detailing them? How he could have received threats of any kind based on nothing more than a disposable email address is beyond me, and when I typed in "Jeff Tavolieri" in Google, I got no references at all for anyone with that name.

Except one.

It's called RationalWiki. A place called a "trash heap" by one, and "inhabited by thugs" by another. They're on record as using "cyber-terror tactics" in an effort to remove Conservapedia from the internet; they're the ones who employ DDoS attacks, major and minor vandalism, links to porn and worse...and all because they were thrown out of Conservapedia when they couldn't get their way. Which means - like the "suicide rant" in Wikipedia back in January and detailed in an earlier posting - this "Jeff" was a fake. So, what he said above back in October applies right now, and he is brutally honest in all of his hate:

"I will lie, revise history, cheat, steal and censor to further our goals. What are you going to do about it? I will stop at no end, but you have to operate within the fictional bounds of your morality. How can you win this game when I can break the rules? Give it up and get out of america while you still can because nothing will stop us. Do you think you're going to fight? Do you think we would have any problem using chemical warfare or weapons of mass destruction? Do you think we care if women and children get in the way? Face it, we will win."

I disagree with you, "Jeff". You lost.

Update...

Since I posted this it was only a matter of time - in fact, less than two hours - that "Jeff" would make his response, and this is what he said:

"What you didn't get through your thick skull was that later emails with Will were edited...by Will. Unless you think I'm Will and I was logged into his CP account editing my letter to myself which I posted on my own userpage."

Now the October emails in Willminator's page are back to not being "Jeff's", or heavily altered. If that's the case, if these emails are not "Jeff's" at all, then he has absolutely no reason for attacking me.

And he ends this latest one by saying "You're lucky I don't kick your ass you piece of (censored)". Ahh, I would have loved to see him try to do that, especially in a courtroom. But that has become typical of those whose lies have gotten the best of them, because when they're caught at it, they whine and scream and holler.

Oh well.

And another update...

March 11, 2011.

Now he's got to report me to Blogger; he's upset that I "outed" him as being a fake and a fraud, and as at the beginning, he's got to engage in harassment:

"hey, loser, nice blog. i've contacted blogspot about having it removed and providing logs of your actions."

I'm still waiting for him to carry out his threat of court action. Look's like I'll be waiting a long, long time.

Monday, February 7, 2011

Coward with a capital "C"

For the past year or so I have been editing in Conservapedia, the family-friendly conservative alternative to Wikipedia. No porn. No swearing. No in-fighting. Liberals can't stand the site, and they have done all they could to disrupt, damage, and shut it down. Their antics have involved extortion, blackmail, server attacks, and major and minor vandalism.

And we all thought liberals preach tolerance. Tolerance is just a joke to them.

So, the attacks continue, but try as they might they still fail. Take this silly troll for example, someone who uses a proxy from Santo Domingo in the Dominican Republic. He's been coming into Conservapedia for a year every now and then, trying to get under my skin like a cheap tattoo, and now he's created his page just for that purpose within Blogger. He resorts to calling me a "koward" or calling me a closet homosexual. And he's got to make his threats like...well, like he's a cheap comic book villain:

"You knew this would happen sooner or later, as you'd have to confront me, your nemesis. I see little has changed since our last encounter: same rants, same stupidity, same underwear."

"Same stupidity" he accuses me of. And he comes into a public blog to make threats?

I'm still waiting for him to confront me. He knows exactly where I live, but he's too scared to even make a drive-by look, let alone stand on my front porch. But he's got to leave the occasional e-mail, the posting of his profanity on Conservapedia, or raid my blog like he did a short time ago, leaving his mental capacity wide open so we can see how devoid his mind actually is:

"By the way, I send my heartfelt condolences to you and your acolytes. Koeckritz was a valuable, if loathsome, contributor. I had hoped the old witch Phyllis would kick the bucket first, but the world isn't perfect, is it?"

"Phyllis" refers to Phyllis Schlafly, a conservative pundit who this troll clearly wishes were dead; and "Koeckritz" is someone who actually did pass away more than a month ago, as indicated by his faked condolences. The troll called my nemesis - Slowpoke Rodriguez or whatever he calls himself - would rather continue with his cheap hate that act like anything remotely resembling a man. I get the feeling he looks and acts more like the skulking Smeagol character of the Lord of the Rings films.

"Anyway, remember that you and I are in this together, until the end. We fight to kill, koward."

His final line. A threat to continue the fight he and he alone created. A threat to kill. Unfortunately, he's nothing more than a silly little girly-man craving attention. A wanna-be bully who is nothing more than what he called me: a coward. And since he decided to be stupid as well, his little threats have been reported to whomever runs Blogger.